Mickey Walker

It’s the Borrowing and Spending, Stupid!

It’s the Borrowing and Spending, Stupid!

Mickey Walker-August 8, 2010

A good friend and I were talking recently about how stupidly people would buy spin instead of the truth.  There were glaring examples of how spin was the new truth when clearly it was not.  So I made a few remarks about the Moral Majority and held it up to the light.  Was the Moral Majority truly a religious organization?  Headed by Jerry Falwell, a Virginia preacher and founder of Liberty University and many television shows of his own, on the surface he seemed to be.  But was it right that he used tax-exempt money in the collection plate of his church to further his political agenda to elect Ronald Reagan to president, to promote their own brand of political values, and to target the opposition candidates on a “Hit List” to unseat them all?  I made a comment that the Moral Majority, was, in fact, not moral.  It preyed upon the faithful to collect monies as any PAC would only tax free because the founder, Jerry Falwell, called himself a church.

My friend taunted me with, “Are you saying the only ones that don't buy the spin and therefore can discern the truth is the immoral minority?  Wouldn't that make them moral? i.e. part of the moral majority?’”

“You know I am not.”  I told him.  The Moral Majority from the git-go is immoral.  When they got out of the God business and into stumping for their candidates from the pulpit, they should have lost their tax-exempt status.  But those in government were immoral, too, so they did nothing to preserve our Constitution there, either.  And I think my point is that there are few who do not buy the spin and can discern the truth.  Reagan and Falwell, who inflicted the Moral Majority upon America in an attempt to contaminate religion with politics, did so only for the votes.  That pact with the dark side, from the beginning, was immoral.  Still is.  And fooling the American people to believe a holy war against the Evil Empire, Russia, was essential to living in a moral world, and the welfare of America, was mega immoral.  It was a lie based upon greed.  And it was immoral, too, to convince America to build up our arms by borrowing 3 Trillion dollars during Reagan’s 8-year reign, while continuing to chide his political opponents as being Big-Spending Democrats.  Talk about the parable, "Do not pay attention to the speck in your brother's eye while ye pay no mind to the plank in yours?" But my point to my friend was that Reagan had camera appeal.  He had a smile and delivery that would melt the lens. Lots of actors got that.  People believed him and some call him the best president ever.  But it was anything but moral to use God, The Evil Empire rhetoric, and the church to build up arms while rewarding the military-complex that Ike warned us about.  Ike’s Warning

The purpose of the buildup was to redistribute wealth and incur debt.  If that ain’t immoral then Pat Robertson is a true man of God and not a businessman turned charlatan with a profitable television show and Jesus Power Bars and shakes what FEMA spent millions on after Hurricane Katrina. If Halliburton could win no-bid contracts with the US Govt. and could sell Uncle Sam a hammer that cost them $10 at Wal-Mart for $500 and those running the government were in cahoots with the thievery, then that fleecing of the American people who pay taxes, is immoral.  The proof of the crime is in the price of the hammer with no one crying, “Rape!”  A hammer is not worth $500, so the difference is an immoral profit.  And that immoral profit grew to become a redistribution of wealth to the Halliburton’s of America, and all such defense contractors who sold war machinery and products to the government.  Only trouble was (wink and nod) Uncle Sam awarded many of them the contract without having to bid on it.  Somehow that little no-bid trick seems immoral, too.  But, thanks to government complicity, a no-bid contract would eliminate investigations and competition, wouldn’t it?  Does that seem moral?  And was the result of the massive borrowing and spending under Reagan and Bush II to build up the military industrial complex business really worth it?  America’s sinking into a 14- Trillion dollar debtors’ prison hole that we will never get out of, does that seem immoral, somehow?  Just askin’.  And isn’t the result of all that under the table chicanery to fool the American people into believing that our military needed a massive buildup, well isn’t that downright immoral?  Heck when Reagan started his 3-Trillion dollar debt he added to the Treasury we were not even at war.  But the Evil Empire was a scary beast, you know, them Russians, them communists.

Then Bush II finally attacked two countries at the same time (Iraq, based on lies about WMDs), which added another 4 Trillion dollars (Ka-ching) to the National Debt. I ask you isn’t that worse than just stealing simply because the stealing was accomplished by people we elected as our representatives to perform their sacred duty as fiduciaries of our public trust?  And isn’t that immoral, seeing as America is left holding the remnants of our once great economy in a sack with a hole in it due to the two presidents who gave us a combined effort of 7 Trillion dollars further in debt?  Reagan and Bush II.  Was it worth all the lost jobs?  Was it worth setting America awash in Trillions of dollars of worthless derivatives?  And at the mercy of Wall Street and its demonic new shell game of credit default swaps that on the sell end they tout and then turn around and short-sell with an innocent face?  Was it worth all the homes people had to walk away from to sleep in their cars?  While trying desperately to get on the welfare rolls. When the Treasury is bankrupted by all the borrowing and spending for the greed profits of war corporations?  Was all the borrowing and spending worth a bankrupted future for us and our kids?  While the printing presses grind ‘round the clock to inflate our dollars to pay off the unconscionable debt our leaders borrowed us into?  Oh, but let’s blame Obama for his first year and a half, many say.  While the true perpetrators of our destruction got to walk, laughing all the way to the bank and Paraguay.  Bush family buys Paraguay land and more:

Senator William Proxmire did his best to expose such immoral stealing with his "Golden Fleece Award" which broadcast the most flagrant boondoggle example of stealing.  One such memorable boondoggle had the Government paying $600 for Home Depot toilet seats that are worth $19.95.  How many million toilet seats were involved I do not know.  Proxmire knew that it was totally immoral and wanted the American people to show outrage and rise up against the thieves and bandits of the public trust.  They did not. You didn’t hear a peep out of them. The television ads, paid for by the deep pockets that benefitted from the immoral no-bid contracts put the damper on Proxmire and his kooky assessment of the government's business.  He was told that the government agency made hammer specifications so precise and exact that one had to be made from scratch.  This would cost many times the price of a common hammer, the defenders of this mass thievery contended. This was reiterated by an Air Force Colonel I spoke to a few years back.  Yes he too, blamed the government for not just loosening their specifications on how the hammer was supposed to be made so that hammers could be bought off the shelf from Home Depot or Wal-Mart for the reasonable price of say, $20.  This lame response was typical of the government defending even its most bizarre and deplorable wasting of tax dollars.

Proxmire and Ralph Nader, I believe, mentioned that a simple tool like a hammer should not cause so much excess stress on our National Debt.  Somehow the requirements of the government agency that needs the hammer should be eased so that the agency could ask for and be able to use the more reasonably-priced hammer.  No soap.  That brilliant idea must have died in a deep pocket committee somewhere.  Besides, it would have broken the no-bid contractors' rice bowls to make immoral profits that they so love to make.  Eisenhower must be turning over in his grave.

So what happened to our brains?  Did they feed us something in the water?  Why couldn't we see that government and the military industrial complex continue to play the American people like fiddles while they steal us blind?  When we see immoral behavior by those who tax us to pay for their greed, why cannot we say, STOP.  NO MORE.  Have we gone crazy?  Doesn't the immoral wrecking ball of the military corporation complex in bed with government concern us?  Is it not disturbing to know that we are being boiled slowly like a frog in a pot?  Guess not.  And that, dear hearts, is why our Treasury is more than bankrupt into the Trillions of dollars while the inflated dollar itself is burning while we watch American Idol.  Funny how people sometimes talk about earmarks being a bad thing.  But they overlook the biggest earmarks of all, the military industrial complex and the government agencies that condone them robbing us blind while destroying America.  It’s the borrowing and spending, stupid.

print     email article