The Well Infidel

Whining - Can We Please Have Less Of It?

by Donald B. Ardell - February 21, 2010

I think I could turn and live with animals, they are so placid and self-contained,
I stand and look at them long and long. 
They do not sweat and whine about their condition,
They do not lie awake in the dark and weep for their sins,
They do not make me sick discussing their duty to God,
Not one is dissatisfied, not one is demented with the mania of owning things,
Not one kneels to another, nor to his kind that lived thousands of years ago,
Not one is respectable or unhappy over the whole earth.

Walt Whitman, "Leaves of Grass. Song of Myself, 31." 1892

Most people find much to applaud about REAL wellness principles, even those who are not living in a manner recognizable as "healthy" or consistent with a big concern for quality of life. This is not surprising, as nearly everyone at least appreciates (if not lives in a manner consistent with) certain upwardly mobile, socially supported wellness values.  These include respect for personal responsibility (in theory, applied to others), reliance on one's own resources and a disdain for the usual and customary obstacles to personal effectiveness (sloth, recklessness, negativity, dependency, blame, excuses and the like), most of which they indulge generously.

It's a wonder, when you think about it, that politicians do not brag about how dedicated they are to REAL wellness, as well as the flag, children, soldiers, guns, God, motherhood and apple pie.

Don't you agree that most functional people would find the notion of self-responsibility attractive and admirable, something to value in others and at least try to manage themselves? If you agree, then you might be alarmed or at least concerned about a rather anti-wellness trend in America today, namely, the growing popularity--and even political correctness, of whining!

I view whining as frequent complaining, explaining and/or believing that you are not getting yours, oftentimes "because of them." That's just my definition; Webster's 9th New Collegiate version of whine is "to utter a high-pitched plaintive or distressed cry." You get the idea.

Whining does not change anything.  Worse, whining impedes change, since it implies that progress is not possible because of them (e.g., gays, government, elitists, lesbians, Washington insiders, Democrats, secularists, sexists, racists, homophobes, extraterrestrials, men, mad dogs, etc.). An wellness alternative to whining is to identify a specific problem unambiguously, examine a range of options about its cause and repair and, after a bit of pondering, choosing a course of interpretation and action (assuming the problem is at all within your ability to influence).

Of course, the profession most responsible for this trend and for rendering whining profitable as well as socially acceptable is the legal profession.  However, I readily acknowledge blaming lawyers is just my way of whining!  This almost proves that everybody, even self-responsibility pontificators like me, can succumb to the lure of whining (also defined as “to complain or protest in a childish fashion”), now and then. Whining seems to be endemic in the land of the free and the brave.  Politicians promise pressure groups that help elect them special favors to make amends for the awful things that society once did or still does to them.  Social commentator Fred Gorman suggests politicians, mostly lawyers, are the "pimps of  blame," entrepreneurs who make a living getting people to make each other responsible for problems that they suffer.  Alas, many people seem eager to embrace these explanations, thus playing the blame game and seeking to sue somebody else for their difficulties. What would Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh or Bill O’Reilly talk about if they could not whine?

One of the worst symptoms of institutionalized, legalized whining is the bizarre trend in the area of corporate political correctness/sexual harassment policy.  Did the early promoters of fair employment practices, concerned about male piggery of a physical nature against persons in a dependency situation with limited assertiveness skills, social options or personal resources, wish to create a system of institutionalized whining?  It's so bad that lawyers are now called in when someone decides to be “offended.”  Any remark, such as an oafish or even brilliant attempt at humor that someone considers off-color, inappropriate, a “boundary crosser” or otherwise sufficient to cause one to feel uncomfortable, becomes is a basis for legal action. What chilling effect does this have on equal opportunity for all, if a policy or law favors but one class or gender?  Does this trend not imply that all members of a class (e.g., females) are fragile, delicate, brittle and without the capacity to deal with jerks?  The system has become a major inhibitor, a whine generator and a weapon for malcontents - and both genders suffer the loss of free expression as a result.

There are giveaway symptoms of rampant whining.  I’ll identify a few, followed by a wellness strategy for ameliorating the whining problem. You should go into “whine alert” mode when the following are noticed:

·           Problems are attributed to the evil misdeeds of one villainous group or another. 

·           Demands are made for government solutions to social problems.

·           Victims refuse to accept any responsibility for the consequences of their actions.

·           There is a reluctance by the complainer to deal with her problems, preferably with direct communication of an unmistakable nature or, if that does not work, to deliver a swift kick to the derriere of an offending party. 

·           A proliferation of special interest groups asserting victimhood.

·           Complaints overly dramatized, as in cries that justice has been outraged, compensation should be paid and punitive damages added for good measure.

Increasingly, as corporations transition from wellness programming focused on health risk appraisals, smoking cessation, physical fitness assessments and the like, more can be done to help people learn how to think straight!  One of the most undernourished elements in the wellness movement is education of the workforce to the benefits of more responsibility and less whining. The most underrated, ill treated disease of our time?  Victimitis, the belief that someone else is responsible for your plight.

Ashleigh Brilliant captured the nature of the problem in PotShot # 3823:  "Life is too important to be taken as a joke but too ridiculous to be taken seriously."

Don Ardell is the Well Infidel.  He favors evidence over faith, reason over revelation and meaning and purpose over spirituality.  His enthusiasm for reason, exuberance and liberty are reflected in his books (14), newsletter (521 editions of a weekly report) and lectures across North America and a dozen other countries.  

print     email article